Aspen Policy Academy

Consumer Advocates Reject Utah Legislation as Model for AI Policy

  • Article Published May 6, 2025

This article originally appeared on Inside AI Policy on May 6, 2025.

By Mariam Baksh

Legislation set to take effect in Utah this week has been touted by industry-aligned groups as a model for Congress to govern artificial intelligence, but consumer advocates say the coming updated policy is even more permissive than its original and that adoption of its provisions would likely lead to more harm than good.

“[SB 226] should not in any way be a model for federal or other state AI legislation,” Ben Winters, director of AI and data privacy for the Consumer Federation of America, told Inside AI Policy.

Winters was referring to legislation which, starting May 7, will narrow the scope of disclosure requirements currently in force for companies providing artificial intelligence services to residents of Utah.

“Regulation mitigation” provisions described by the bill’s proponents as a way to balance innovation and consumer protection have generated support from centrist think tanks like the Aspen Policy Institute, researchers from which are recommending greater transparency and consistency to improve public trust in its implementation.

Browse Related Articles

REUTERS/Ahmed Saad

AI is undermining OSINT’s core assumptions. Here’s how journalists should adapt

This article was originally published on the Reuters Institute website on December 12, 2025.

The Promise and Risk of Digital Content Provenance

This article originally appeared on the Center for Democracy & Technology’s website on December 12, 2025.

Aspen Policy Academy Touts AI Government Moves by NYC

This article originally appeared on InsideAIPolicy.com on December 4, 2025.